단대부고 2025 고2 2학기 기말 · 영어2

다음 글에서 필자가 주장하는 바로 가장 적절한 것은?

We encounter framing effects everywhere in our daily lives. Consider the fact that EU migrants cost the UK government £408.12 per second in public expenditures and contribute £463.35 per second in revenue. A newspaper may have a headline saying “EU migrants cost the UK government £408.12 per second in public expenditures” and add the rest later in the article, which will immediately lead many readers to have a hostile attitude toward immigrants. Another newspaper may write “EU migrants contribute £463.35 per second in revenue” as a headline and put the rest later, which will generate a completely different response among its readers. There are several ways to prevent yourself from being influenced by the framing effect. First, you can reframe the information in your own way. Another way is to consider options and possibilities that are not included in the information. Some questions are framed in such a way that you are shown only two choices: Is competition good or bad? When you are faced with a question like this, it is important to remember that the effects of competition may differ according to the context.

1. ①언론은 독자들에게 정확한 정보를 제공해야 한다.
2. ②복잡한 문제일수록 여러 관점에서 분석해야 한다.
3. ③객관적인 정보 제공으로 시민 참여를 증진해야 한다.
4. ④프레이밍 효과의 영향을 받지 않도록 노력해야 한다.
5. ⑤대중매체를 통해 사회 구성원 간의 정보 격차를 줄여야 한다.

밑줄 친 “Quantification is a way of making decisions without seeming to decide”가 다음 글에서 의미하는 바로 가장 적절한 것은?

1. ①Numbers reveal facts free from interpretation or bias
2. ②Using data eliminates political influence in policy decisions
3. ③Data allow governments to make fair and consistent decisions
4. ④Statistical reasoning can give policy decisions an appearance of credibility
5. ⑤Reliance on statistics can be a meaningless practice employed usually by officials

다음 글의 주제로 가장 적절한 것은?

Consider the case of a stallholder selling cheap perfume — his willingness to sell at a low price raises suspicions that the perfume may be fake. The problem arises because unlike the seller, the buyer is uninformed about the quality of the perfume. In a situation where one party has more information than the other party, the market tends to push out sound products in favor of bad ones. For example, the condition of a second-hand car may be unknown to the buyer, but owners of bad vehicles usually have more incentive to sell than owners of good vehicles. So buyers assume that the average quality of cars on offer is low. As a result, they are only willing to pay low prices, and because owners of cars in good condition can’t get decent prices, fewer of these are offered until eventually only faulty vehicles are left. This phenomenon also occurs in health insurance, where people’s health is unknown to the insurer. Those most keen to buy insurance may be unhealthy people that the insurer least wants to insure.

1. ①uneven information causing market quality decline
2. ②consumer distrust damaging business relationships
3. ③adverse selection creating market imbalance
4. ④sellers exploiting information advantages
5. ⑤price serving as a quality indicator